This election cycle is shaping up to have some exciting and impactful contests in our region and beyond. Early voting is already underway ahead of the August 13th primary day, so read this and go vote! Each election cycle, LCC’s Advocacy team reaches out to elected officials in the region we serve to solicit responses on a few questions important to businesses and employers. We hope these responses will help inform our members about the candidates on the ballot on August 13th for the party primaries and November 5th for the general election.
About the survey: LCC’s advocacy team reached out to candidates for seats within Chittenden County with an online questionnaire. Candidates who did not complete the questionnaire are listed here for the purposes of showing all participants in the contests. Their responses are shared here with minimal editing only in instances where it was necessary for clarity. This page will be updated as some candidates participate late and to include material such as other surveys and questionnaires, forums, and other outside resources.
If you have questions, comments, or concerns, please email [email protected].
Senate Candidates
Chittenden Central
(3 Seats)
The new Chittenden Central District (CHIT CT 1) is comprised of Burlington, Winooski, part of Colchester, and much of Essex. This district has three seats. There is one incumbent running in this new district.
Candidate Biography
I’ve been in the State Senate for 14 years, serving this past biennium as the President Pro Tem. I’ve been on a selection of committees, including Appropriations, Judiciary, Economic Development, Agriculture, and Education.
Why are you running?
I think, with the massive turnover in the Senate over the past couple of years, experience and institutional memory are at a premium.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Yes. We incubate great companies here in Vermont (I could list, but I won’t), and those companies benefit from our reputation for natural beauty and environmental purity. Our business community tends to be more socially responsible than in other states, and as a whole I think the Legislature is responsive to the requests each session to foster workforce, housing, etc.
We could certainly be doing more to grow the ranks of high-paying trades: electricians, plumbers, contractors. More and better incentives for kids exiting high school who select these trades, or seek related credentials.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?”
Our solution was the Act 250 Modernization bill we just passed, a very innovative compromise that both the Chamber of Commerce and the environmental groups supported. It lifts Act 250 in most of the parts of the state where housing needs to be urgently built, and in that way makes real headway in de-duplicating regulation and permitting.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
I do, but I’d stress that when we do, we need solid performance metrics that show uptake in travel related to the campaign. Travel sites now offer very robust data that can help us determine whether a campaign in DC or NYC moves the needles on travel packages. But yes, generally I support marketing campaigns, and always supported incentives to the film industry for films shot here.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
I think the most basic element missing from our system is a check on local spending. Yes, we have now reestablished Excess Spending thresholds, and that should hold down budgets some. But the way the system is currently set up almost encourages local communities to spend without regard to taxation levels outside their own bailiwick. So some sort of hard-cap allowable growth percentage seems like a necessary fix, a line over which a budget cannot go to voters, without examination by a central budget watchdog. Maybe it turns out that the percentage ultimately is justified, but if not, the school board in question would need to reduce the spending to an allowable level. The Green Mountain Care Board is meant to function in this way, to curtail healthcare spending.
Candidate Biography
I’ve been in the State Senate for 14 years, serving this past biennium as the President Pro Tem. I’ve been on a selection of committees, including Appropriations, Judiciary, Economic Development, Agriculture, and Education.
Why are you running?
I think, with the massive turnover in the Senate over the past couple of years, experience and institutional memory are at a premium.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Yes. We incubate great companies here in Vermont (I could list, but I won’t), and those companies benefit from our reputation for natural beauty and environmental purity. Our business community tends to be more socially responsible than in other states, and as a whole I think the Legislature is responsive to the requests each session to foster workforce, housing, etc.
We could certainly be doing more to grow the ranks of high-paying trades: electricians, plumbers, contractors. More and better incentives for kids exiting high school who select these trades, or seek related credentials.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?”
Our solution was the Act 250 Modernization bill we just passed, a very innovative compromise that both the Chamber of Commerce and the environmental groups supported. It lifts Act 250 in most of the parts of the state where housing needs to be urgently built, and in that way makes real headway in de-duplicating regulation and permitting.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
I do, but I’d stress that when we do, we need solid performance metrics that show uptake in travel related to the campaign. Travel sites now offer very robust data that can help us determine whether a campaign in DC or NYC moves the needles on travel packages. But yes, generally I support marketing campaigns, and always supported incentives to the film industry for films shot here.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
I think the most basic element missing from our system is a check on local spending. Yes, we have now reestablished Excess Spending thresholds, and that should hold down budgets some. But the way the system is currently set up almost encourages local communities to spend without regard to taxation levels outside their own bailiwick. So some sort of hard-cap allowable growth percentage seems like a necessary fix, a line over which a budget cannot go to voters, without examination by a central budget watchdog. Maybe it turns out that the percentage ultimately is justified, but if not, the school board in question would need to reduce the spending to an allowable level. The Green Mountain Care Board is meant to function in this way, to curtail healthcare spending.
Candidate Biography
My family moved to Vermont in 1972 and I attended public schools in South Burlington. I have a BA and MA from the University of Vermont, and have called Burlington home since 1995. I am a retired high school teacher, and have been a member of the Burlington School Board since 2018 and serve as Co-Chair of the Finance and Facilities Committee.
I currently serving as Vice-Chair of the Senate Education Committee and Clerk of the Senate Health and Welfare Committee.
Why are you running?
I have spent my life serving my community as a coach, a teacher, a school board member and now as your Senator. I have worked in the Legislature to reduce healthcare costs. I have proposed groundbreaking education reform legislation that would save the State money and reduce our property tax burden. I want to return to Montpelier to keep fighting for a better future.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Vermont has a lot of work to do to become more business-friendly. We need to innovate and invest in ways that allow both small and large businesses to thrive here and this will take courage, leadership and change. Doing what we’ve always done is not an option.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
As we know, we can not create new jobs and expand our workforce without growing our housing stock. This needs to be the number one priority.
The tax issue is important, as double-digit increases are not sustainable. We need to be focused and targeted in reforming our education system in Vermont while at the same time reforming the way we finance education, keeping in mind our tenets of equity. Local municipal budgets should be held to similar scrutiny.
At the same time the only way we will create more jobs is to invest in young families and then promote those investments in a well-organized campaign across the country. Childcare, excellent public education and housing this is available and affordable will all attract young families to Vermont and keep them here. Investing in technical education will pay dividends down the line and will allow us to grow our own workforce right here in Vermont.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Yes, I believe we need to build more housing. I voted in favor of H.687, a bill that includes Act 250 reform. This reform uses a tiered approach that will promote housing development in certain areas of the state while streamlining the environmental review process in these areas. This bill also aims to preserve green spaces across the state which are important to climate change mitigation, wildlife and to preserving the “Vermont brand,” which is an important part of our economy. The Act 250 reform that is part of H.687 is a good start in addressing our lack of housing.
As part of housing reform, Vermont also needs to make concerted efforts and investments in the development of manufactured home neighborhoods, modular homes that are quick and easy to build and changes to zoning laws that allow for accessory dwelling units. A range of housing options must be provided including low-income housing as well as missing-middle housing for folks who do not make enough to buy a house but do not qualify for government assistance.
Homelessness is a housing problem, so the way to address the problem is to build and provide more housing to Vermonters. Leadership at the highest levels must come up with creative and immediate solutions to get houses on line for folks with a variety of income levels.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes, absolutely! I am going to answer this question with a quote from my niece. She is a young professional and visits every summer from Denver. While here she drives from Hinesburg to work during the day at Hula. Here is what she says, and I couldn’t agree more: “I know I say this every summer but…if Vermont in fact is wanting to attract younger people to move here…all Vermont needs to do is run a marketing campaign nationwide and promote places like Hula. This is how you get people like us to move here. I’m literally obsessed with this place. I know people that would consider moving for something like this! I swear! Not sure if you work with anyone in the capital focused on attracting new Vermonters, but this is one of the ways.” There is nothing more powerful than hearing from the very people we want to attract, and I hear this refrain every summer.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
There are various unique pressures being placed on the Ed Fund that are resulting in higher property taxes. They range from rising health care costs, to the end of Covid-era federal funding, to salary increases and construction costs to local spending decisions. In the meantime, the State lacks a comprehensive strategic plan for its educational future.
Act 60 was landmark legislation that changed the way Vermont paid for education. With its passage, we created a system that provided equity across the state and allowed for high quality education regardless of zip code. And with Act 127 Vermont recommitted to the idea that students have unique needs and require different investments to learn by adjusting and updating the funding formula. Our way of funding education is not simple but it does provide equity and opportunity to schools and children that many states don’t enjoy.
I do not want to go back to tying education to the wealth of a town, however, I understand that tying school funding to property taxes can create dissatisfaction and can result in the failure of school districts to pass budgets. But before we radically change the way we fund schools, we must first dig into the hard work of examining the efficacy of local control, we must right-size the entire system and we have to create cost-effective systems that allow for shared resources and efficient buildings that run at capacity.
We are often rated in the Top 5 in the country in terms of our K-12 education system. The work ahead will take great political courage, and I am here to lead, to do the work and to take risks to create a robust, sustainable and affordable education system.
Candidate Biography
I grew up in southern Vermont and landed in Burlington to attend UVM, majoring in economics. That sparked a four-decade career in Vermont radio & television journalism. I covered 20 Legislative sessions, six administrations and virtually every major story over a generation, retiring as a top-rated anchor/reporter in February.
Why are you running?
I want to improve the lives of Vermonters and help ensure the success of my state.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
No. On top of the disruption of the pandemic, Vermont employers face a range of economic challenges including rising taxes, fees and health costs to do business in 2024. Vermont’s long-standing demographic and recruiting difficulties remain. I believe many of our big problems stem from our severe shortage of reasonably-priced housing — i.e. units available to rent or buy that are attainable particularly for those early in their careers, as well as for new recruits to Vermont, for seniors and for those in recovery. I believe expanding housing options or every type must be our priority.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Encourage accelerated housing construction for working age Vermonters and young families — and continue the transition to renewable energy and efficiency. We must encourage our tourism economy in the face of climate uncertainty and seriously reconsider our antiquated structure of public education with an aim toward fewer but newer and larger schools around Vermont. Lawmakers must utilize all federal infrastructure funds to continue to improve transportation and modern communication networks.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
I’ve made my position on building a lot more housing of every type very clear. I think it’s the #1 issue facing our state.
The Act 250 reform bill passed this spring was years overdue but its impact on the housing market won’t be known for some time. As a state senator I will make sure we stay on it, and commit to a multi-year effort to spend tens of millions in public dollars annually on affordable housing. We must be open to new housing models, like ADUs and modular housing, which may fit the needs of segments of our population. Given the severity of the shortage, I want to clamp down at least in the short term on ‘short-term rentals’ like Air BNBs that are directly contributing to the scarcity of housing for working Vermonters. Towns in my Senate district have been approving new housing projects in recent years and I hope to see a similar reception in northern Vermont. Our economy depends on it.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes, of course! Vermont has a valuable brand and our state and industry leaders have been working to capitalize on this for decades, with a lot of success.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
As stated earlier, our state is about to (again) reconsider its complex tax/funding mechanism AND look at changing the structure of K-12 schools.
It seems clear many students continue to struggle to learn in the wake of Covid-19 disruptions and social pressures. Soaring health care and mental health costs are a big driver.
If we want to get some control over the tax burden we might look at reducing the scope of administrative overhead, close some buildings with crushing deferred maintenance, and look honestly at student enrollment trends in many of our communities. Per pupil cost drivers in Chittenden County look different from those in rural areas. Everyone agrees we need great teachers and schools but 14% statewide property tax increases each year work for no one.
The Legislature’s newly-appointed commission will make recommendations in the months ahead. I don’t want to prejudge the work. I am sure this will be a fraught debate as Vermont weighs how to ‘right-size’ its school system. At least there appears to be pretty broad agreement we cannot continue the status quo.
At this time, this candidate has not provided a response to LCC’s candidate questionnaire.
Chittenden Southeast
(3 Seats)
The new Chittenden Southeast District (CHI SE 1) encompasses part of Burlington, South Burlington, Charlotte, Hinesburg, St. George, Williston, Richmond, Jericho, Bolton, and Underhill. This district has three Senate seats. There are three incumbents running in this new district.
Candidate Biography
I grew up in Vermont graduating from SBHS and UVM. I’ve been elected to the South Burlington City Council three times (2015, 2017, and 2020) and have been twice elected by the faculty of the University of Vermont to serve as their Faculty Senate President. I also served the Chair and Vice Chair of the Green Mountain Transit Authority (2015–2020).
Why are you running?
I am running for office because I want Vermont to adopt policies that create more opportunities for current and future Vermonters to be able to live here, work here, stay here and thrive here.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
No, sadly we aren’t. I see too many policies and perspectives at the local level and in the state house that do not understand the macro societal benefit enterprise and economic growth bring to Vermont by raising our collective quality of life through higher salaries, career opportunities and direct capital investment. We can make Vermont more business friendly by electing more people who are friendly to business.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
The role of the state government can foster economic growth by focusing our limited resources on public safety, transportation infrastructure and with clear understandable welcoming regulatory policy that reduces uncertainty for potential investors in our state.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Yes, we need housing across the socioeconomic spectrum. We need more workforce housing, affordable housing, high density housing, middle class housing, single family residences, townhouses and more. We need more roofs in Vermont; more housing stock to meet the housing demand/need will make all housing more affordable while creating more fluidity in the market creating more opportunities for repurposing commercial & housing stock to increase density.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes, but I never supported the program that paid people to move to Vermont. I fully support marketing Vermont on the regional, national and international stage to showcase the quality of life and opportunities to invest here in the Green Mountain State.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
I would like to see an expansion of the Excess Spending Threshold Penalty to have variable rates on categories of spending. This policy, just restored this year, is on total spending per weighted pupil but that leaves a great deal of variability without transparency on spending categories within each district. I’d like to see an Excess Spending Threshold rate on Support Staff Salaries, Admin salaries, Title I salaries, maintenance salaries, guidance salaries and more categories of types of positions within each school district.
We need to re-evaluate eligibility for the Property Tax Credit with a wealth attestation qualifier and a ratio considering the number of occupants relative to finished square footage of declared homesteads.
I also see value in revisiting the foundation formula a.k.a. adequacy payment formula more common in other states but any migration to this would need a five-year runway.
Candidate Biography
Senator Lyons represents Chittenden SE. Ginny chaired the Senate Committee on Natural Resources and Energy guiding early responses to climate change, stormwater, land use planning, toxic substances. She is Chair of Senate Health and Welfare and a member of Appropriations Committees. Lyons’ legislation reflects a commitment to people, cost effective decision making, public health and the environment.
Why are you running?
Losing 6 Senate leaders means my experienced leadership is critical for stability in the Senate. Collaborative decision making with business, local government, farms, and other constituents can help people and solve challenges including: education property taxes, opioid crisis, housing, health care, emergency preparedness, climate change, and economic development.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Yes- Vermonters at local and state levels respond to business needs through regulatory changes, land use planning, grants, loans, tax credits, or other incentives. Growth center legislation provides for towns, environmental planners and developers to build where transportation or other services are accessible. Business can grow in population centers such as downtowns and village centers. The pandemic placed significant emphasis on business workforce needs. The legislature responded with investments in child care, health care, retail, farm, food service, and other businesses. This includes workforce education, loan forgiveness, loan repayment, and similar support. Following losses from flood events legislation provided businesses with state tax relief. Some businesses are losing prospective employees when housing is unavailable. Affordable housing development is underway for workers in partial response to this issue. Vermont’s environmental quality is important to the business culture. Land use, water quality, distributed energy, Wi-Fi access are each critical for business success.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Housing, environmental quality, incentives, child care, internet access influence Vermont’s job growth – along with education, access to health care and transportation. Housing legislation responds to concerns from technology, Health, farm, child care, teachers, and other workers. The economy can’t grow without workforce and workers need affordable places to live. Development in downtowns, villages, and growth centers through capital investment, tax credits, local zoning options helps provide needed housing. Localized affordable or workforce housing helps attract workforce and maintains Vermont’s environment. It is important to ensure housing meets local guidelines for immediate needs. Continued investment in workforce education programs, loan repayment or loan forgiveness will help grow jobs. Market analyses, like one I did for health care workforce, are needed in many sectors of business economy determining educational workforce investments. Businesses may need public/ private investments such as continued upgrades to IT services. Capital programs (VEDA or VEGI) and workforce development programs create jobs. Child care businesses are critically important to attracting and keeping workforce. The child care act passed in 2023 maintains and increases child care centers, workers, child placements, and family resources. Parents keep jobs with greater access to child care for their kids.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
More and diverse types of housing are needed for diverse groups of people. Workers at every income level need housing near transportation, health services, retail, and food shopping. Not everyone can live in the rural landscape. Some folks are concerned that towns might grow into urban settings and lose Vermont’s character. Some look for infill development for single family and rental opportunities. Housing for Long term care, SUD recovery, transition from incarceration, people with mental illness, and for Vermonters with special needs are challenging and also needed. Adding the homeless population compounds the challenge. The 2024 budget and recent housing policy builds on work by legislators, administration, local planners, VHCB, developers, businesses, environmental and social service advocates. Regulatory changes direct development and tax credits to downtowns, village and growth centers. The housing act ensures environmental standards complement development. The millions of dollars available for affordable and other housing types is important for workers, towns, business, and people needing temporary or permanent housing. It will take time and effort at regional and local levels for build out.
I advocated that VHCB funds be designated for mental health, SUD, and housing for those with disabilities. This is in the 2024 budget. Projects are going forward for vulnerable Vermonters as they are for workers. Performance evaluation of these investments is important. Housing for the working poor and long term care need attention. People in Vermont’s Reach Up program should be included for access to available housing. Some homeless folks are working two or three jobs and still cannot save enough to rent or buy. We are losing nursing homes and related facilities as the population ages. Investments in facilities or services that allow folks to stay at home can improve Vermont’s economy. It is important that outreach continue to those who are homeless.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Tourism is largely based on Vermont’s environment and is critical for our economy. Each season draws diverse visitors contributing to sales, rooms and meals, taxes and fishing and hunting license fees. Regulated public / private investment relationships can reduce risk to the state and private enterprise. Avoiding investments that lead to financial failure requires oversight. It is appropriate that we invest in marketing efforts that draw people to VT. Efforts to attract new residents will be ineffective if lack of adequate/ affordable housing continues to deter people from accepting jobs. It doesn’t help that news reports continuously decry the high cost of living, poor salaries, lack of affordability or housing in the state. Many parts of the country have similar problems. Emphasis on the availability of child care, access to outdoor recreation, strong educational opportunities K-16, and Vermont’s strong sense of community can draw investors or new residents. Vermont’s landscape is attributable to conservation easements and a demonstrated commitment of forest and farm sectors of the economy. An influx of people who became residents during the pandemic was an eye opener, as is the high number of people with second homes in the state. Can a balance be struck between those owning seasonal properties and permanent residents? Can the remote worker program be more effective in attracting new families? Could a film tax credit bring additional investment? What role can the notion of energy independence play in marketing Vermont’s strong environmental ethic?
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
Loss of federal pandemic funds, and inflation hinder purchasing power for schools. Recent votes against school budgets reflect this pressure – a wake up call that school funding needs major repair – less complexity, lower property taxes, with an in depth look at alternatives. The Commission on Education Funding and Committee on the Future of Education will bring specific recommendations for 2025 budget changes for property taxes and public education. School funding is complex, a byzantine labyrinth perplexing school board members, legislators, and community members alike. Preserving local engagement and family participation in schools is critical for kids. How can a school board connect local spending with state wide or local property tax determinations when the funding formula is so dense? How can equitable outcomes result when students in districts have access to more resources than others? Does money equate to improved student outcomes? Can capital improvements be made in our aging school infrastructure? The Commission should consider at least the following: how do other states provide per pupil funding lower than Vermont’s?; Regional administrative districts to increase purchase power or provide teacher contracts consistent with the economy; define basic services for which schools are responsible; are there services that shouldn’t be funded through property taxes; can income taxes be better included; define roles of the AOE and local decision making; can tax changes to seasonal homes support schools; how do other states accommodate those on fixed incomes (New York’s STAR Program); should Afterschool or behavioral or mental health grants be separate from property taxes; can property values for Ed tax purposes be separated from real estate sales; what will avoid catastrophic increases in property taxes?.
Candidate Biography
Chair of Senate Economic Development, Housing & General Affairs; leading housing advocate in the legislature; recent EPA Environmental Justice Awardee.
Why are you running?
To continue to create opportunity for every Vermonter to thrive and build a life here.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Vermont is not currently workforce friendly in its high cost of living (see Economic Policy Institute’s Family Budget Calculator). We are making strides with our universal child care policy, but have a long way to go in terms of housing and health care costs. I am working to address these issues so we have a workforce that can help our businesses grow and succeed.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Support VEGI, listen to and reward businesses that are paying well and trying to remain in Vermont.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Yes, all types of housing, especially multifamily along existing water and sewer infrastructure. We must reduce permitting barriers and delays and ensure our investments are effective in driving down the cost per unit.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes, though we need to wait on recruiting people to live here until we have housing.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
Create school construction incentives for “newer and fewer” regionally excellent school facilities and invest remaining dollars in repurposing unneeded school buildings into economic, housing, and community use.
Chittenden North
(1 Seat)
The Chittenden North (CHI N 1) District includes a portion of Essex, Westford, Milton, and Fairfax. This district has a single Senate seat.
Candidate Biography
Born, raised and continues to reside in Milton with his wife Kari, son Cash and dog Riggins. Chris owns and operates a property management and excavation business as well as being a licensed real estate salesperson. He has been a member of the House of Representatives since 2017.
Why are you running?
I am running for office to create an affordable Vermont where my son can grow up in, my wife and I can stay in, and my parents can retire in. I think many can relate to this in one way or another.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Vermont has many pros and cons when it comes to being business-friendly. Overall, I would have to say the cost of doing business here outweighs the benefits. The Vermont lifestyle is one to be admired with our beautiful environment and close-knit communities. However, the high cost of housing, taxes and day-to-day expenses makes it very difficult to attract and retain quality employees. In the recent years, the legislature has increased payroll taxes, professional regulation fees and DMV fees. There has also been attempts to increase income taxes and creating a wealth tax. We should be doing what we can in the legislature to promote economic development, not restrict it.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
The legislature should continue to promote industries that thrive in Vermont, like we have with the captive insurance industry. Providing interim tax incentives to offset the high cost of doing business here could also help create more jobs. You see across the country, states promoting tax incentives to attract new businesses. The short-term loss of revenue to the state, would quickly return long term gains in the future. Not to mention the increased economic activity new jobs foster by welcoming new Vermonters to our state. We also need to continue to promote jobs in the trades. In order to continue building housing, commercial and industrial buildings, we need to have the skilled workforce required to complete these projects. Careers in the various trade fields can provide well-paying jobs.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Everything centers around creating more housing, notably, affordable to those seeking it. If we want to be able to welcome new Vermonters to high-paying jobs, we must create more housing. If we want to be able to retain current Vermonters we must create more housing. The housing stock in Vermont is older and new housing will create more options. Everyone has different needs, whether its rental or ownership. Renters need to have the ability to have choices in where they want to live unlike it is now with the effectively zero percent vacancy rate. First time homebuyers are fighting for the same housing as those that have the means to outspend them. Middle-income earners are finding it difficult to find their forever home with the lack of inventory. We also need to have the option for our senior citizens to move into assisted living facilities, purchase a smaller home all while still having the ability to stay in their own current home if they chose. By providing more options for housing and increasing inventory, it would create a more favorable market for those seeking housing.
The number one hinderance to development is regulation. The Act 250 permit process can be costly and unpredictable. The Governor has provided ways to make a more streamlined process which I support. Unfortunately, the legislative majority had their own plans.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Like Governor Scott says, “We need more taxpayers, not more taxes.” And I could not agree more with his statement.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
The past four years I have served on the Ways and Means Committee. In 2024, with a looming projected property tax increase of 18.5%, the time was now to reform education finance. I thought we were on a path in committee with the needed change. Through the lobbying efforts of advocates, our work was derailed in a matter of days and pushed off to yet another study. Our education finance system needs to more closely align individual district spending with their own tax rates. Currently, what happens in Essex, Westford, Fairfax, Milton as well as all the other districts in the state, all effect each towns tax rates.
I think Vermont has a great system of teachers, administrators and support staff. Providing more local control allowing schools to effectively teach the children they serve will provide for better outcomes. From my time at Milton, I was lucky to have great teachers who went beyond teaching what was just in the book and helped shape me into the person I am today.
Candidate Biography
Born, raised and continues to reside in Milton with his wife Kari, son Cash and dog Riggins. Chris owns and operates a property management and excavation business as well as being a licensed real estate salesperson. He has been a member of the House of Representatives since 2017.
Why are you running?
I am running for office to create an affordable Vermont where my son can grow up in, my wife and I can stay in, and my parents can retire in. I think many can relate to this in one way or another.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Vermont has many pros and cons when it comes to being business-friendly. Overall, I would have to say the cost of doing business here outweighs the benefits. The Vermont lifestyle is one to be admired with our beautiful environment and close-knit communities. However, the high cost of housing, taxes and day-to-day expenses makes it very difficult to attract and retain quality employees. In the recent years, the legislature has increased payroll taxes, professional regulation fees and DMV fees. There has also been attempts to increase income taxes and creating a wealth tax. We should be doing what we can in the legislature to promote economic development, not restrict it.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
The legislature should continue to promote industries that thrive in Vermont, like we have with the captive insurance industry. Providing interim tax incentives to offset the high cost of doing business here could also help create more jobs. You see across the country, states promoting tax incentives to attract new businesses. The short-term loss of revenue to the state, would quickly return long term gains in the future. Not to mention the increased economic activity new jobs foster by welcoming new Vermonters to our state. We also need to continue to promote jobs in the trades. In order to continue building housing, commercial and industrial buildings, we need to have the skilled workforce required to complete these projects. Careers in the various trade fields can provide well-paying jobs.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Everything centers around creating more housing, notably, affordable to those seeking it. If we want to be able to welcome new Vermonters to high-paying jobs, we must create more housing. If we want to be able to retain current Vermonters we must create more housing. The housing stock in Vermont is older and new housing will create more options. Everyone has different needs, whether its rental or ownership. Renters need to have the ability to have choices in where they want to live unlike it is now with the effectively zero percent vacancy rate. First time homebuyers are fighting for the same housing as those that have the means to outspend them. Middle-income earners are finding it difficult to find their forever home with the lack of inventory. We also need to have the option for our senior citizens to move into assisted living facilities, purchase a smaller home all while still having the ability to stay in their own current home if they chose. By providing more options for housing and increasing inventory, it would create a more favorable market for those seeking housing.
The number one hinderance to development is regulation. The Act 250 permit process can be costly and unpredictable. The Governor has provided ways to make a more streamlined process which I support. Unfortunately, the legislative majority had their own plans.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Like Governor Scott says, “We need more taxpayers, not more taxes.” And I could not agree more with his statement.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
The past four years I have served on the Ways and Means Committee. In 2024, with a looming projected property tax increase of 18.5%, the time was now to reform education finance. I thought we were on a path in committee with the needed change. Through the lobbying efforts of advocates, our work was derailed in a matter of days and pushed off to yet another study. Our education finance system needs to more closely align individual district spending with their own tax rates. Currently, what happens in Essex, Westford, Fairfax, Milton as well as all the other districts in the state, all effect each towns tax rates.
I think Vermont has a great system of teachers, administrators and support staff. Providing more local control allowing schools to effectively teach the children they serve will provide for better outcomes. From my time at Milton, I was lucky to have great teachers who went beyond teaching what was just in the book and helped shape me into the person I am today.
Candidate Biography
I cut my teeth in local government, leading (and winning) 9 successful issue campaigns. My reach into my Senate district is broad and deep from attending meetings / events and canvassing homes. I’ve demonstrated critical thinking, insisted that statutes be followed, and called out wasteful spending.
Why are you running?
Vermont needs common sense laws and legislators who understand / speak up for their constituents. Voters are aghast at some bills we passed. I understand why and want to continue to fight for them.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Vermont isn’t business-friendly.
Businesses have been chronically challenged with finding workers. I voted yes on Child Care so that more parents can enter the workforce.
Electricity is relatively expensive here, and the majority (not me) just voted to increase its cost by passing H. 289 (RES).
Our cold climate means we must heat our buildings. Last year, the majority (not me) voted to study increasing the cost of fossil fuels via S.5 (Clean Heat).
Taxes are relatively high, but failing to pass the yield bill would have had dire financial repercussions. Thus, I voted yes on H.887 to fund the voter-approved school budgets. Good schools attract / keep families here, which can only help businesses.
These are some of the votes I made with an eye toward improving the business environment here in Vermont.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Incentivize students to train for and stay with jobs in health care and building trades, for example, so that businesses have skilled labor to hire.
Encourage private-public partnerships to build congregate housing in densely populated areas and along bus routes, so that potential workers have places to live and the means to get to work.
Reduce the unfunded mandates and red tape that only grow with each passing (pun intended) legislative session.
Spend more time listening to and believing business owners who complain when regulations are too onerous.
Streamline regulation and find other ways to minimize government interference.
Treat business owners with the respect they have earned for taking risks and losing sleep over how to make ends meet and keep their business (and their employees) afloat during these difficult economic times.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
We absolutely need more housing. We should prioritize rehabilitation of existing buildings in already-developed areas, to minimize sprawl. I’m glad to see millions of dollars allocated each year from the General Fund toward increasing the supply of housing.
We need to ensure that we keep aesthetics at the forefront of development, lest we lose the Vermont brand. What makes Vermont appealing is its natural beauty!
Even before we build out the housing supply to meet demand, we need to shore up wastewater treatment facilities to stop the near-constant accidental dumping of raw sewage into our waterways by old and insufficient infrastructure. If our waterways can’t support life forms other than blue green algae, tourist dollars will go elsewhere.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
We should continue to market our state to outsiders for the purposes of building our brand as a safe, spacious, beautiful place to visit, invest and live. Vermont has earned its reputation over the years as a great escape from the rat race in nearby metro areas.
As the climate catastrophe unfolds, more and more people are looking for a place like Vermont that has a temperate climate, plenty of water, and land on which to grow food.
Therefore, we needn’t oversell our state. But we should ensure that when people visit or consider investing, our reality comes close to matching their expectations.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
The repercussions of COVID isolation are lasting far beyond the initial year(s) of quarantine. Mental health and other specialists may be a fixture in our school districts for some time.
We need to take a hard look at the curricula that were sold to our school districts. We no longer teach cursive writing. What fine motor skills were needed / have been lost? We no longer teach phonics or diagram sentences in many schools. Could that be part of the literacy problem? What about the New Math? It’s time to get back to basics.
Some added educational expenses are related to our violent culture. Schools didn’t need intricate security systems before school shootings became an all-too-frequent crime.
Some expenses, such as busing children long distances to school, are a function of living in a rural state. Another would be the fact that many of our schools have smaller populations and fewer economies of scale than larger ones.
My cousin, who worked as a teacher down South, moved to New England when her children were young for the higher quality education here. She talks about moving back now that they have graduated college.
Perhaps K-12 education is a business, like tourism, that attracts certain people to Vermont? Not all of them will stay forever, but they pay the bills while here.
Grand Isle
(One Seat)
The Grand Isle Senate district includes North Hero, South Hero, Isle La Motte, Grand Isle, and a portion of Colchester
Candidate Biography
I was appointed by Gov. Scott to the Senate in May. I am the Executive Director of the Lake Champlain Islands Economic Development Corporation and the President of the Regional Development Corporations of Vermont. I owned his own business for eleven years and have chaired my local school board.
Why are you running?
Education Funding. I believe finding an equitable way to fund our schools and relieve property taxes is our top priority.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Yes. While this has never been a great place for heavy industry, Vermont has built a strong brand that can be applied to a wide variety of products and services. The recreational economy provides strong support for hospitality and retail services. Independent shops and restaurants remain competitive here and are accessible to middle and low-income entrepreneurs as opposed to chain stores and franchises that require high personal wealth to open.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
We should expand our offering of economic development services. VEGI and the Vermont Training Program do not apply to enough businesses. Greater technical assistance programs with small grants and navigator services could be offered with short-term goals that fill gaps in our economy. For example, providing assistance transitioning businesses from a retiring owner to a young entrepreneur.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Yes. I don’t believe we should build exclusively in our downtown and village districts, however, it does make sense to focus the majority of our efforts there. Developing denser, more walkable villages, and downtown districts would alleviate some of the challenges we currently face in the state. I believe the changes made in H.687 have made this development much easier. For the rural areas, we should continue to provide support for funding water and wastewater systems for municipalities. Federal funding is available, but municipalities need capacity assistance to be able to apply.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes. Vermont has done a better job of promoting its brand than most states and we’ve seen the benefits of this already.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
Of course there will be differing perspectives across the state, but this is how I would propose handling it.
Step 1 is to have a meaningful statewide conversation about the way we deliver education, especially in our more rural communities. It’s always a tough discussion, but it will be difficult to provide significant tax relief without addressing costs and considering alternative models.
Step 2 is to create transparency in school budgeting and better connect local voting to tax rate implications. School budgets are stuffed with all kinds of expenses that are tied directly to state and federal mandates that must be fulfilled. We should strongly consider pulling mandated items out of local budgets, and allowing voters to weigh in on a streamlined budget of items their local board can control
Step 3 is to provide a more granular ability to adjust our property tax base rates. Since COVID we have seen a rise in homes that are occupied for only a small portion of the year. These absent owners are not contributing to the other sources of revenue that we use to fund education. The state has a right to be made whole on these properties and I believe we should develop additional tax tiers to capture vacation home revenue.
Candidate Biography
I reside in Colchester, holding a Tourism Management degree from VTSU and finishing a Master’s in Leadership. Currently a Commissioner on the Cannabis Control Board, I was formerly Chair of the State Ethics Commission with a 20-year HR career. I enjoy reading, skiing, and paddle boarding.
Why are you running?
I am running for office to champion transparency, support small businesses, and address our biggest challenges – especially our housing crisis. I hope to help build a resilient Vermont that is ready for the future.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Approximately 90% of Vermont’s businesses are small businesses, which are the backbone of our local economy. Our state boasts a culture of creativity and innovation that nurtures entrepreneurial ventures, making it a unique and vibrant place to live and work. However, we can and must do more to support these vital enterprises. I envision a future where small businesses have not only the encouragement but also the practical support they need to thrive. This means creating clearer pathways for entrepreneurs to access existing resources and support systems. Too often, small business owners are overwhelmed by the complexities of navigating regulatory requirements and finding financial assistance. By streamlining these processes, we can make it easier for them to succeed. As a Senator, I would advocate for a regulatory and policy framework that prioritizes the stability and growth of small businesses. This includes considering policies that are conducive to the needs of small enterprises, allowing them to flourish without undue burden.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
Resolving Vermont’s housing crisis is the first step in attracting and retaining well-paying jobs in our state. Affordable and accessible housing is a cornerstone of economic development. Without it, businesses struggle to recruit and retain talent.
Next, investing in our state colleges is essential for improving the available jobs in our State. State colleges are not just educational institutions; they are engines of economic growth and innovation. By investing in these institutions, we can develop a skilled workforce that meets the demands of modern industries, making Vermont an attractive destination for businesses seeking talented employees.
When companies scout locations, they prioritize areas with a readily available talent pool and essential local supports such as housing and educational systems. Addressing these needs is crucial for attracting young families to Vermont, which in turn will draw well-paying jobs. By focusing on these areas, we can grow our population and boost our local economy.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Yes, I believe we need to build more housing. The type of housing should reflect market demand, including mixed types that offer “starter” homes and options for families as well as senior citizens looking to downsize. Areas for new housing should have access to economic opportunities, jobs, and community supports.
The feedback I have received from my community indicates a strong need for housing that includes wrap-around services and transportation options for seniors. By addressing these needs, we can ensure that our housing solutions are comprehensive and supportive for all demographics. Additionally, well-planned housing development can stimulate economic growth and create vibrant, inclusive communities.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes, especially considering the increased interest in agro-tourism and outdoor recreation, Vermont should be marketing its best features including locally made products, to encourage visitors and support economic growth.
Agro-tourism, which includes activities like farm stays, vineyard tours, and cheese-making workshops, can draw visitors eager to connect with Vermont’s agricultural roots. Similarly, promoting outdoor recreation, such as hiking, skiing, and kayaking, can attract adventure enthusiasts. By leveraging these attractions, Vermont can boost visitor numbers, support local businesses, and generate revenue for the state.
Boosting interest in relocating to Vermont through targeted programs could indeed be beneficial for the state’s economy, especially if paired with efforts to improve housing availability. It’s a strategy that could attract new residents, potentially contributing to economic growth and community vitality.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
Firstly, it’s crucial to recognize that the cost of our education system includes expenses beyond direct educational costs for our school-aged children. One significant contributor to the recent alarming cost increases, highlighted in the last legislative session, is healthcare expenses. While not the sole issue, healthcare costs deserve more attention and must be addressed as part of our reform efforts.
Secondly, we should consider the multitude of reports and recommendations made over the past two decades. The Joint Fiscal Office website hosts extensive analyses of our education funding system, spanning many years, offering numerous options for reform. I am confident that the commission established under the yield bill will thoroughly evaluate these options along with new proposals for reform.
Lastly, what is most needed in this scenario is political courage. When faced with the need for significant changes, we often hesitate to make bold decisions. Unfortunately, this hesitation also prevents us from implementing practical solutions. It’s time to demonstrate bravery and take decisive action to address these challenges head-on.
Candidate Biography
I was appointed by Gov. Scott to the Senate in May. I am the Executive Director of the Lake Champlain Islands Economic Development Corporation and the President of the Regional Development Corporations of Vermont. I owned his own business for eleven years and have chaired my local school board.
Why are you running?
Education Funding. I believe finding an equitable way to fund our schools and relieve property taxes is our top priority.
Is Vermont Business Friendly?
Yes. While this has never been a great place for heavy industry, Vermont has built a strong brand that can be applied to a wide variety of products and services. The recreational economy provides strong support for hospitality and retail services. Independent shops and restaurants remain competitive here and are accessible to middle and low-income entrepreneurs as opposed to chain stores and franchises that require high personal wealth to open.
What could the Legislature do to support the creation of more well-paying jobs in Vermont?
We should expand our offering of economic development services. VEGI and the Vermont Training Program do not apply to enough businesses. Greater technical assistance programs with small grants and navigator services could be offered with short-term goals that fill gaps in our economy. For example, providing assistance transitioning businesses from a retiring owner to a young entrepreneur.
Do you believe we need to build more housing? If yes, what kind of housing, where, and what could spur this to happen in your opinion? If not, why not? What is your solution?
Yes. I don’t believe we should build exclusively in our downtown and village districts, however, it does make sense to focus the majority of our efforts there. Developing denser, more walkable villages, and downtown districts would alleviate some of the challenges we currently face in the state. I believe the changes made in H.687 have made this development much easier. For the rural areas, we should continue to provide support for funding water and wastewater systems for municipalities. Federal funding is available, but municipalities need capacity assistance to be able to apply.
Do you think we should be marketing our state to outsiders for the purposes of building a brand people relate to as the right place to visit, invest, or live?
Yes. Vermont has done a better job of promoting its brand than most states and we’ve seen the benefits of this already.
With the high increases in property taxes this past legislative session, Vermont has more than likely become the state with the highest per-pupil spending in the country, yet our schools are not producing results commensurate with that investment. What do you think needs to be done to address the issues around both the cost and results of our education system?
Of course there will be differing perspectives across the state, but this is how I would propose handling it.
Step 1 is to have a meaningful statewide conversation about the way we deliver education, especially in our more rural communities. It’s always a tough discussion, but it will be difficult to provide significant tax relief without addressing costs and considering alternative models.
Step 2 is to create transparency in school budgeting and better connect local voting to tax rate implications. School budgets are stuffed with all kinds of expenses that are tied directly to state and federal mandates that must be fulfilled. We should strongly consider pulling mandated items out of local budgets, and allowing voters to weigh in on a streamlined budget of items their local board can control
Step 3 is to provide a more granular ability to adjust our property tax base rates. Since COVID we have seen a rise in homes that are occupied for only a small portion of the year. These absent owners are not contributing to the other sources of revenue that we use to fund education. The state has a right to be made whole on these properties and I believe we should develop additional tax tiers to capture vacation home revenue.
At this time, this candidate has not provided a response to LCC’s candidate questionnaire.
Submit your advocacy questions:
Help us seek economic opportunity for all Vermonters. Support our advocacy work.
Become a member of the Lake Champlain Chamber or connect with our advocacy team to learn more about sponsorship opportunities